wireleaf

programming.career

Weekly career thread

pale-finch-24
bright-thistle-69

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
sunlit-fern-902 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
bright-clover-71

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
gentle-rowan-52

sunlit-fern-90 wrote:

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
amber-otter-75

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
wild-sparrow-36

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
rustling-willow-63

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
gentle-lichen-12

Second this.
Reply
woven-sedge-673 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
tidal-beech-142 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
slow-finch-441 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
hollow-fern-30

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
woven-clover-5

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
sunlit-reed-72

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
silver-otter-416 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
mossy-thistle-285 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
misty-rowan-582 more

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
quiet-moth-83

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
dusky-lichen-76

Could you share a photo?
Reply
copper-clover-891 more

mossy-thistle-28 wrote:

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
woven-sedge-75

Good question, following.
Reply
woven-birch-266 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
silver-pine-37

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
mossy-thistle-294 more

woven-birch-26 wrote:

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Saving this for later.
Reply
woven-moth-43

mossy-thistle-29 wrote:

woven-birch-26 wrote:

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
copper-pine-11

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
tidal-beech-671 more

mossy-thistle-29 wrote:

woven-birch-26 wrote:

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
still-yarrow-27

Same experience here.
Reply
woven-thistle-111 more

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
amber-hazel-64

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
woven-wren-661 more

Second this.
Reply
wild-fern-10

Could you share a photo?
Reply
still-beech-231 more

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
gentle-hazel-61

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
tidal-sedge-2

Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
rustling-sedge-87

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
woven-reed-13

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
wry-pine-184 more

Could you share a photo?
Reply
late-otter-993 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
pale-moth-40

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
bright-alder-811 more

late-otter-99 wrote:

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
tidal-alder-71

bright-alder-81 wrote:

late-otter-99 wrote:

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
misty-birch-24

Same experience here.
Reply
bright-willow-3525 more

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
gentle-clover-817 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
wild-moth-559 more

gentle-clover-8 wrote:

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
silver-willow-781 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
hollow-sedge-43

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
still-moth-702 more

wild-moth-55 wrote:

gentle-clover-8 wrote:

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
amber-thistle-37

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
hollow-hazel-20

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
gentle-pine-223 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
woven-pine-17

gentle-pine-22 wrote:

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
dusky-rowan-11 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
silver-beech-5

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
wry-fern-2

gentle-clover-8 wrote:

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Same experience here.
Reply
wry-beech-445 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
rustling-beech-191 more

wry-beech-44 wrote:

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
dusky-moth-27

rustling-beech-19 wrote:

wry-beech-44 wrote:

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
amber-wren-332 more

wry-beech-44 wrote:

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
wild-heron-23

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
tidal-alder-10

amber-wren-33 wrote:

wry-beech-44 wrote:

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
gentle-clover-356 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
sunlit-hazel-1

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
quiet-beech-454 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
slow-otter-311 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
rustling-beech-19

slow-otter-31 wrote:

That's fair.

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
wry-yarrow-191 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
woven-thistle-11

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
still-fern-50

Good question, following.
Reply
sunlit-otter-32

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
tidal-birch-2614 more

Good question, following.
Reply
gentle-reed-7313 more

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
gentle-hazel-433 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
mossy-clover-72

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
dusky-clover-40

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
dusky-reed-70

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
woven-willow-47

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
mossy-alder-41

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
sunlit-otter-912 more

gentle-reed-73 wrote:

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
gentle-heron-93

Same experience here.
Reply
silver-reed-4

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
woven-sedge-571 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
quiet-rowan-25

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
misty-fern-68

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
wry-beech-91

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
hollow-reed-12

Saving this for later.
Reply
misty-wren-332 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
gentle-yarrow-38

Same experience here.
Reply
wild-thistle-98

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
misty-yarrow-121 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
gentle-rowan-3

misty-yarrow-12 wrote:

That's fair.

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
silver-reed-0

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
gentle-moth-59

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
mossy-sedge-28

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
dusky-finch-84

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
wild-thistle-82

Second this.
Reply
wild-reed-63

Could you share a photo?
Reply