This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Same experience here.
wild-sedge-23 wrote:
Same experience here.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
woven-pine-17 wrote:
That's fair.
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
dusky-clover-18 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
woven-pine-17 wrote:
That's fair.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wild-willow-65 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
copper-willow-63 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
hollow-otter-22 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
rustling-moth-25 wrote:
hollow-otter-22 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.
slow-beech-3 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
still-sedge-92 wrote:
slow-beech-3 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
slow-beech-3 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
bright-alder-31 wrote:
slow-beech-3 wrote:
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
late-reed-46 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
bright-otter-33 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
bright-otter-33 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
hollow-rowan-36 wrote:
bright-otter-33 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
This deserves its own thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
quiet-beech-1 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The cheap option was fine for years.
woven-pine-17 wrote:
That's fair.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
woven-pine-17 wrote:
That's fair.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
woven-pine-17 wrote:
That's fair.
The official docs are better than they look.
hollow-beech-76 wrote:
woven-pine-17 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
woven-heron-83 wrote:
hollow-beech-76 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
bright-moth-34 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Same experience here.
Could you share a photo?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
gentle-lichen-12 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This deserves its own thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Same experience here.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Same experience here.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
wry-fern-37 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
dusky-rowan-92 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Second this.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
gentle-heron-49 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
slow-finch-26 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Same experience here.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
Good question, following.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This deserves its own thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.