Matrix is getting worse, or is it me?
still-finch-28
mossy-fern-69
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
hollow-pine-4013 more
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
woven-rowan-581 more
hollow-pine-40 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
wry-beech-91
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
dusky-otter-553 more
hollow-pine-40 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
tidal-wren-541 more
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
silver-clover-96
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
rustling-sedge-38
dusky-otter-55 wrote:
hollow-pine-40 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
misty-moth-135 more
hollow-pine-40 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Could you share a photo?
Reply
wild-thistle-132 more
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
woven-moth-931 more
This deserves its own thread.
Reply
woven-finch-10
Same experience here.
Reply
silver-beech-97
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
slow-reed-71
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
late-moth-48
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
quiet-clover-94
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
wry-heron-271 more
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
hollow-thistle-54
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
quiet-willow-513 more
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
wild-pine-911 more
quiet-willow-51 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
misty-fern-6
wild-pine-91 wrote:
quiet-willow-51 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
slow-rowan-48
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
silver-fern-33
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
amber-otter-82
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
wild-lichen-62 more
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
pale-beech-1
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
wild-sparrow-37
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
tidal-wren-54
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
copper-yarrow-42
Small correction, but the point stands.